Ash ([info]ashkosis) wrote,
@ 2006-01-30 23:02:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:oto

The Social System of OTO
Something I've been thinking about the last few days is the multi-dimensional web of social spheres and interactions within Ordo Templi Orientis. Although not unique to O.T.O., I have been looking at our three meta-dimensions, which are the individual sphere, the inter-communal sphere, and the extra-cultural sphere. While each one is distinct, they are all interconnected in fascinating ways.

OTO Web of Interactions



The Individual

Thelema is largely concerned with the state of the individual. There is a strong emphasis on an individual's True Will and the notion that a person is responsible for himself alone, especially in regards to manifesting that Will. Within the Order, the path one takes is completely left in the hands of the initiate. From one point of view, it can be said that OTO largely exists to provide an initiatory structure catered to the individual, while providing resources for that person to use along his or her own path of spiritual growth. Ultimately, the process of advancing through the degrees, studying their lessons, and applying them within one's life is strictly a matter of an individual's choices, capabilities, and Will.

General Order Goal: to promote advanced students of magick (in the largest sense of that term) that are capable of manifesting their unique Will as individual adepts, as fraternal initiates, and in the world at large.

The Community

Although the Order is made up of individuals all on their own unique paths, the fact remains that OTO could not function without the cooperation found only in groups. Of course, there are many different types of groups, both formal and informal, within the Order, including local bodies, governmental bodies, guilds, chapters, Grand Lodge, clergy, and even LJ users. It is even possible to see the various grades and degrees as groups. Each of these groups have their own unique form of community, all of which have both an instrumental and socio-emotional aspect.

General Order Goal: to promote healthy and effective Thelemic communities, all of which have a good balance of mutual support and personal challenge that inspires members to excel.

The External Culture

O.T.O. does not exist within a vacuum, and our foundational documents make it clear that OTO is expected to make an impact on the larger culture. At the same time, that culture has an inescapable impact on us, especially in terms of civil laws and social mores. The other important aspect of this dimension is that it is the repository from which potential new initiates arrive, while also being a force that can draw away existing members.

General Order Goal: to promulgate the Law of Thelema within the larger society, while also increasing the influence and empowerment of the Order so as to provide greater freedom for our works, both internal and external, and to attract quality membership.

Interactions


As the graphic illustrates, these three spheres, while discrete, are not isolated and have a high degree of interactivity. This is really where things get interesting, because within the Order as a dynamic organization, this is where the rubber meets the road, so to speak.

Individual interacts with O.T.O. Communities

This is certainly the most dynamic area of interaction within O.T.O., since there are thousands of individuals and lots of different groups. However, the most common would have to be the interaction between the individual and her local body community. Of course, there are many other groups, most of which are instrumental in nature, such as guilds and governing bodies. In almost all cases, I argue the general theme should be one of Stewardship. In this sense, the individual member chooses to join a group, and in so doing, voluntarily accepts the duty of sharing in the responsibility (and the rewards) of its well-being. This is a form of service (which is so central to OTO), and can take the form of the Three Pillars (Material Sustenance, Service to Community, and Fraternal Support), while also aspiring to be the best brother or sister one can (as perhaps embodied in the four fraternal character traits, courage, integrity, cordiality, and foolishness).

The flip side to this, of course, is the responsibility of the community to the individual initiate. I believe that, at the local level, there are several important duties in this regard, including (but not limited to) the ability to perform quality ceremonies (i.e. initiations and the Mass), to provide opportunities for leadership paths, problem solving services (such as mediation and pastoral counseling), communication of important or useful information, competent administration (e.g. accurate financial work, prompt execution of paperwork, etc), and general guidance, fellowship, and assistance as appropriate. A close reading of Liber CI will give a clear picture of what Crowley intended for the Order to provide to individual members.

On a different level, it should be noted that this zone of interaction includes other groups, such as Grand Lodge and other governing bodies towards individual members. To a large degree, most of these interactions are administrative, involving the day to day operations of the organization. However, there is another aspect that is not as concrete, but is a vital aspect of a voluntary member/group relationship, and that is the matrix of vision, leadership, and loyalty.

This is a concept that I've only begun to flesh out, so it is not in its final form. However, the essential idea is that this matrix is a two-way interaction that involves all players putting energy into the overall forward motion of the Order. This requires vision (which is the idea of where we are going), leadership (providing the tools and energy into getting there), and loyalty (which acknowledges that we can only get where we are going if we work together). While vision and leadership are traditionally the responsibility of those at the highest level of authority, the situation is not that simple. Vision can be affected, even if but a little, by individual members at any level, depending on the strength of the idea. Leadership is also something that all members should embody, which is not necessarily tied to authority. Traditionally, loyalty travels from the bottom up, but I suggest that in O.T.O., those at the highest level must also remain loyal to all others, since the higher grades serve the lower. Again, this model isn't robust yet, and I'll continue to develop it.

Individual interacts with External Culture

When an individual comes to O.T.O. she brings with her a large store of values, beliefs, skills, and behaviors that are derived from the culture she grew up and exists in. In this way, mores from the larger society unavoidably find their way into the Order, one person at a time. Of course, as the initiate spends time in the Order and advances through the degrees, the essential principles and beliefs of Thelema become integrated into the individual's worldview. Also, hopefully the member will continually learn to hear her Will and improve her ability to manifest it. As she does, she will be taking these Thelemic principles, beliefs, and behaviors out into the world, thereby promulgating the Law through her own efforts and as a model for others.

It is important to note that within this interaction zone, there is a constant push and pull of social forces. In this torrent of influences, the individual will fluctuate in her motivation and ability to participate in the Order. Family, jobs, money, school, and non-OTO activities are, to some degree, always affecting the initiate...it is the rare member that can balance all of them together.

O.T.O. Communities interact with External Culture

For the most part, there are comparatively few interactions between an Order community and the surrounding culture. On one level, this interaction occurs in a passive way, in terms of social mores and laws that affect how the community behaves. For example, a local body might be more open or more secretive depending on the surrounding attitudes and levels of tolerance regarding our beliefs and activities. In this sense, the external culture has a profound impact on the Order, even at the Grand Lodge level, where by-laws and policy are sometimes designed in order to be in alignment with civil law so as to avoid litigation.

Unfortunately, the level of influence is not equitable. The Order and its communities, in general, have little impact on the surrounding culture. One reason for this is because few Order groups regularly interact with the environment explicitly as representatives of O.T.O. There are exceptions of course, such as Crowley's books published in the Order's name, or on the local level, a Lodge presenting the Rites of Eleusis that are open to the public. However, the fact that O.T.O. is such a small organization (fewer than 4000 members worldwide) with few to no connections to bastions of civic power, makes the Order relatively weak in terms of cultural influence.

The Inner Matrix

As we can see, there are many potential areas of interaction. In the very center, of course, is the richest area of all, where the individual, the group, and the external culture connect. To be accurate, this is the "zone of reality" in the sense that all three are, to some degree, in constant play. Said another way, there really is no circumstance where one of the three is not in some way present.

Nothing about this model is particularly original—it is really a rudimentary example of systems theory applied to an organization. However, I wanted to put it together to show how it can be useful to think about not only each of the major spheres, but how they influence each other. In this way, we can see that the Order is, in fact, a complex series of social forces in a constant state of interaction.

~



(99 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 07:48 am UTC (link)
Your observations here are both very interesting and, I venture to say, important.

What it may not address is the relationship between the membership (mostly members of the MMM, technically not members of OTO per se) and the managerial class that determines the policies and practices of the Order. I find that the social interaction between the general membership and the uppermost reaches of the management is superficial at best, and nonexistent at worst. The net result of this is a sharp disconnect at the - as you note - essential to the process and aims of the Order level - between the managers and the managed. This needs to be both measured and looked at in detail.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Interesting
[info]rodneyorpheus
2006-01-31 08:08 am UTC (link)
I find that the social interaction between the general membership and the uppermost reaches of the management is superficial at best, and nonexistent at worst.

Your findings do not tally with my own personal experience. I suggest you get out more.

Rodney

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting
[info]ashkosis
2006-01-31 08:31 am UTC (link)
This is another interesting dynamic within the Order...some impressions, while technically inaccurate, can sometimes have more power than reality. If people believe that interactions are poor, then they are. Of course, in this situation, it depends on what is meant by "social interaction". More data is needed I think...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]rodneyorpheus, 2006-01-31 12:12 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]paradoxosalpha, 2006-01-31 04:42 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:39 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:01 pm UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 05:23 pm UTC (link)
I venture I get out a good deal more than you....and who, pray dear Rodney, made you The Authority...certainly not on me, and, I venture, not on rank-and-file members. If you see them at all, culture of fear dictates you see them only in bowing and scraping mode.

Why, pray, does the management react so negatively to *any* talk of serious survey; of examination of trends, perceptions and concerns of the membership?

This reaction is alarmingly no-nothing, certainly authoritarian and, dare I say (I do! I do!) more that a little cultish.

If you act a little cultish, you wind up with a very *very* little cult.

Watch those membership numbers drop.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-01-31 05:31 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-01-31 06:10 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-01-31 06:55 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-01-31 07:11 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-01-31 09:46 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-02-01 12:11 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 12:28 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-01 01:55 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 03:27 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 12:33 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-02-01 01:04 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 01:11 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:41 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:02 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-01-31 11:23 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:43 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 12:40 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:45 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 03:33 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 07:29 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-01 01:06 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 09:19 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-01 11:03 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-02 12:02 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-02 08:50 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 06:34 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 11:28 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-01 11:37 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 11:52 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-02 02:19 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 03:58 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-02 06:33 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 06:50 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-03 02:01 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-03 03:31 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-03 01:57 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-03 03:34 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]rodneyorpheus, 2006-01-31 06:50 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]xeyeofhorusx, 2006-01-31 07:38 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:05 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-01 01:07 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 09:24 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 11:16 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-02 02:49 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 04:01 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-02 04:05 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 06:40 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-02 07:02 am UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]xeyeofhorusx
2006-01-31 07:27 pm UTC (link)
Well... not everyone is a rock star Rodney... :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:06 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 12:42 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:54 am UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]ashkosis
2006-01-31 05:17 pm UTC (link)
What it may not address is the relationship between the membership (mostly members of the MMM, technically not members of OTO per se) and the managerial class that determines the policies and practices of the Order.

Yeah, my essay didn't cover specific member/group relationships. That would require a small book. However, there IS a relationship between the individual and the group you reference...the question is, how effective is it in accomplishing its goals? This leads to other questions, such as "what is going right?" and "where are the bottlenecks?". Do keep in mind that we have an Ombudsman now (Fr. Hrumachis), so if you are meeting resistance, there is someone there to grease the wheels a bit.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 05:28 pm UTC (link)
"Do keep in mind that we have an Ombudsman now (Fr. Hrumachis), so if you are meeting resistance, there is someone there to grease the wheels a bit."

FYI - When Sabazius first became Sabazius, he asked me if I was interested in the job of Ombudsman.

FYI also, for such an office to be effective, you have to have a responsive upper management which is interested in more than paperwork. I find far more enthusiasm for the Work in the ranks than in the tired, rather burned-out leadership. Pity, but true.

If you are in doubt, try going through the ombudsman not over a late cert or a delay in shipping from the quartermaster, but on *an issue of substance* that is other than management's own immediate list of concerns. Then tell me what you think of this relationship.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-01-31 05:45 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:08 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]ashkosis, 2006-02-01 12:13 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 11:59 pm UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]solis93
2006-01-31 09:58 pm UTC (link)
Do keep in mind that we have an Ombudsman now (Fr. Hrumachis), so if you are meeting resistance, there is someone there to grease the wheels a bit.

The problem with the Ombudsman idea is that Fr. Hrumachis has a vested interest in being a "company man" if he believes that his own advancement depends on how he handles cases and the conclusions he comes to. In other words, the Ombudsman will never disagree or side with GL, no matter how well founded the individuals case may be because to do so would be to allienate himself from the process that dangles the initiation/status/brownie button type carrot.

it's like asking the Bush administration to set up a committe of its own people to make sure nothing unethical occurs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-01-31 11:10 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-01-31 11:25 pm UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]xeyeofhorusx
2006-01-31 07:26 pm UTC (link)
Respect ma authoritah!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 11:11 pm UTC (link)
question ALL authority.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Interesting
[info]xeyeofhorusx
2006-01-31 07:52 pm UTC (link)
Well you know what they say, if you want something done right, do it yourself...

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Interesting
[info]slq
2006-01-31 11:10 pm UTC (link)
So, as part of that managerial class (you are a Bishop and USGL officer after all), do you find that the general membership doesn't like to interact with you socially, or do you not like to socially interact with them?

I believe I personally know most of the people in the "uppermost reaches of management" as you put it, and virtually all of them participate socially and materially in their local body communities. That includes Sabazius, with whom I attended Mass at LVX Oasis last weekend. I personally regularly attend events at 4 local bodies, and enjoy plenty of social interaction in the process. Most other USGL officers I know have a similar level of interaction.

It may be interesting to learn why a few people perceive a "sharp disconnect" that isn't there but I think it is readily apparent in most cases.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 11:14 pm UTC (link)
"I believe I personally know most of the people in the "uppermost reaches of management" as you put it, and virtually all of them participate socially and materially "

Sure. So? Do you think they get the straight opinion of the First Triad members? I guess you do. Then why the objection to a blind survey of the membership? I'm willing to accept what people say when not at the mercy of the bosses.

As for me, it is abundently clear I have no role in management...I wrote a book on UFOs. Two, in fact.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-01 01:28 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 06:52 am UTC
Re: Interesting
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-01-31 11:22 pm UTC (link)
I have *no* say in policy. I am a cop and a secretary. As for "going to local meetings" c'mon. I've seen the sucking up at NOTOCON after NOTOCON and that is the wealthy class of OTO members.

I think you honestly believe it is a friendly meritocracy.

I think it is an authoritarian self-serving upper management drunk on its own titles and perks. What happened to IX*s wander unseen amongst us? It might bring some sting to the comments they get.

You guys kid yourselves constantly. I call the bluff. Survey the membership anonymously....I'll go by that, if you will.

But you won't, will you?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-01-31 11:27 pm UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 12:43 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-01 01:25 am UTC
Re: Interesting - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-01 01:53 am UTC

[info]omphalos111
2006-01-31 06:30 pm UTC (link)
Interesting and striking use of this model. It gave me some thoughts on my own. Thank you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ashkosis
2006-01-31 07:16 pm UTC (link)
You are most welcome. :) I'd love to hear your own thoughts...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]xeyeofhorusx
2006-01-31 07:46 pm UTC (link)
I think this diagram perfectly illustrates Crowley's purpose behind establishing Mass as the central ritual. What else better represents the center segment, the only one you didn't label?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Central Ritual
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-02-01 01:56 am UTC (link)
Central *celebratory* ritual - but - properly understood, I agree. There's nothing wrong with the degrees except where AC's texts have been toned down.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Central Ritual
[info]baal_kriah
2006-02-02 06:30 am UTC (link)
I'm succored to hear you say it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Central Ritual - [info]tausirhasirim, 2006-02-02 06:53 am UTC

[info]tzaddi_93
2006-02-01 08:53 am UTC (link)
"problem solving services (such as mediation and pastoral counseling)"

Do you have any sources of information on pastoral counseling that fits in with Thelema? Several years ago our local body lost a sister to domestic violence. I was tasked with organizing an event with speakers on the topic to help our membership cope with what had happened and to recognize warning signs in the future. After that experience, I started looking for material on pastoral care and found most of it to be written for Christian clergy. I did find a few "interfaith" books and a few workshops targeting Wiccans or Neopagans, but what I'm looking for is material that addresses the basic concepts of pastoral care in the context of Thelema.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]thiebes
2006-02-01 01:42 pm UTC (link)
FYI SML will be hosting a weekend-long pastoral counseling workshop the first weekend of June, led by some highly qualified folks. I imagine it will be very Thelema-centric.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tzaddi_93
2006-02-01 04:38 pm UTC (link)
Sweet! I put it on my calendar!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]solis93
2006-02-01 09:34 pm UTC (link)
led by some highly qualified folks.

OTO member folks, or folks that are in the business of pastoral conseling?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-01 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]solis93, 2006-02-01 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]baal_kriah, 2006-02-02 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]solis93, 2006-02-02 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]omphalos111, 2006-02-02 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thiebes, 2006-02-02 02:42 am UTC
FAR AFIELD
[info]tausirhasirim
2006-02-01 11:56 pm UTC (link)
I think this whole discussion has lost sight of your admirable contribution to the effort to carefully look at the relationships and factors involved in the order today. Much of what is being discussed here goes way outside your parameters, and I want to remind one and all - myself included - that this is our place to comment on your work; we have our own LJs to voice our other concerns and issues.

Thank you, ash93. Valuable work. The very fact that it is so provocative indicates just how important such work is to current concerns.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: FAR AFIELD
[info]ashkosis
2006-02-02 02:59 am UTC (link)
I have found myself surprised at the discussions my humble post has inspired. I know that there is a great deal of discontent out there, for various reasons. Something that I have been doing in the last couple of years, but especially recently, is trying to look at our Order in very different ways. Much of the language we use to describe OTO are remnants of the Crowley and Grady eras. Much of how OTO was looked at in those days were relatively primitive compared to the tools that we have available to us today. I think it is time to avail ourselves of these tools and have the courage to redefine how we look at the Order. I still have immense loyalty to OTO and belief in the fundamental programme that it offers. However, we are still largely stuck, both instrumentally and culturally, in bygone days...I am seeing efforts towards changing this (eg. Kaaba, Education Committee, etc), but we still have a long way to go. I believe that a key to this change towards ramping up the effectiveness of our organization is to inspire a major shift if how we define what it is to be a member, especially in terms to how we behave and interact with other members and groups. As a senior member of OTO, I appreciate your kind words regarding my attempts...it lets me know that I am on the right track.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(99 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…